[Stackless] cool stuff

Aaron Watters aaron at reportlab.com
Wed Aug 14 16:12:51 CEST 2002


Hi Chris.

Yes this is very cool stuff indeed.
I think it's a fundamental innovation.  

But I do think it needs
   1) wait on multiple socket
   2) kill tasklet

(1) is absolutely essential I think.  (2) is needed for situations where
a tasklet is "insane".

You can emulate (1) using polling, but that is a lot of
pointless work for the interpreter.

It also might be nice to have the ability to timeout a channel recv or
send.

I'm working on a stackless infrastructure for socket servers and
clients but it's not ready for public viewing.  Anybody else
got one they are willing to show?

   -- Aaron Watters



_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at www.tismer.com
http://www.tismer.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless



More information about the Stackless mailing list