[Stackless] cool stuff
Aaron Watters
aaron at reportlab.com
Wed Aug 14 16:12:51 CEST 2002
Hi Chris.
Yes this is very cool stuff indeed.
I think it's a fundamental innovation.
But I do think it needs
1) wait on multiple socket
2) kill tasklet
(1) is absolutely essential I think. (2) is needed for situations where
a tasklet is "insane".
You can emulate (1) using polling, but that is a lot of
pointless work for the interpreter.
It also might be nice to have the ability to timeout a channel recv or
send.
I'm working on a stackless infrastructure for socket servers and
clients but it's not ready for public viewing. Anybody else
got one they are willing to show?
-- Aaron Watters
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at www.tismer.com
http://www.tismer.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
More information about the Stackless
mailing list