[Stackless] Population simulation in Stackless

Christian Tismer tismer at tismer.com
Wed Aug 28 19:18:27 CEST 2002

Aaron Watters wrote:

>>>For stackless I would head this way (maybe): use channels as the only 
>>>communication mechanism
>>>and then develop some sort of a safe (and fast) way to share channels 
>>>processes.  Then you could balance the microthreads between a number of 
>>>processes (maybe).

>>Yup. To expand the concept a bit, if I were to ever do the free-threading
>>stuff again, I would add a flag to the relevant objects. If the flag is set,
>>then access is synchronized. When the flag is clear, then it can operate at
>>full speed. Another, somewhat orthogonal flag is a "read only" flag. That
>>would shut down all mutex handling, even on shared data items.

I agree. Without touching objects, creating capable channels
is probably easiest.

ciao - chris

Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/

Stackless mailing list
Stackless at www.tismer.com

More information about the Stackless mailing list