[Stackless] Re: Stackless Python is DEAD!

[Donn Cave]

Quoth Christian Tismer <tismer at tismer.com>:
...
| What do you mean by acceptable?
| The 95 percent of users who get their solution
| in time will for sure accept it. Who else is relevant?

I don't know if anyone is particularly relevant.  By acceptable,
I mean that when programmers decide whether to pursue designs
that depend on Stackless features, you're asking them to accept a
severe loss of portability.  Many of them may find that unimportant,
because as you say the majority platforms will be OK for now.  But
I can't believe it's going to be generally acceptable.  Maybe I just
don't want to believe it, because I think that attitude really sucks.
Whatever, we'll see.

	Donn Cave, donn at drizzle.com
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at www.tismer.com
http://www.tismer.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless