[Stackless] Newbie questions
Konrad Hinsen
hinsen at cnrs-orleans.fr
Mon Feb 17 09:58:05 CET 2003
On Sunday 16 February 2003 16:30, Peter Kropf wrote:
> Out of curiousity, why did you switch from MPI to BSP?
For the same reason that I program in Python and not in C: I don't like to
have to worry about all the details myself.
BSP is much simpler than MPI (the C library has about 20 calls) and the
programmer doesn't have to do synchronization, meaning that deadlocks are
impossible. That eliminates 90% of the problems that MPI developers face in
debugging. Automatic synchronization also permits new development techniques,
especially interactive ones. One of my favourite demonstrations involves an
interactive parallel Python shell (which comes with Scientific Python)
running within Emacs.
There are other advantages to BSP, such as the possibility to predict the
performance of a given algorithm on a given parallel machine without even
writing the code. But for me, simplicity of development is the main reason.
Konrad.
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at www.tismer.com
http://www.tismer.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
More information about the Stackless
mailing list