[Stackless] CVS 2.2 or 2.3
Bob Ippolito
bob at redivi.com
Tue Feb 17 15:31:15 CET 2004
On Feb 17, 2004, at 3:02 AM, Ionutz Borcoman wrote:
> I wanted to get the Stackless from the CVS and discovered that you
> have a complete python tree there.
>
> My impression was that I can use the stackless just like other
> package. It appears that I was wrong. Is it possible to add the
> stackless as a package to the regular Python ? I would preffer to be
> able to take the main Python 2.3 and just add the stackless support to
> it, than recompiling the whole python...
Stackless is a fork of Python, not an extension. It's not reasonably
possible to fundamentally change the way that Python behaves without
some changes to the interpreter itself. Personally, I treat stackless
as a different (and better) language entirely.. but one of the ideas is
that the Python community (well, BDFL) will eventually choose a
stackless implementation.
[something to this effect should probably end up in the FAQ as well]
-bob
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
More information about the Stackless
mailing list