[Stackless] CVS 2.2 or 2.3
tismer at stackless.com
Tue Feb 10 19:11:55 CET 2004
Richard Emslie wrote:
> Hi Chris, Hi stackless - eers!
> I am confused to the current state of the cvs branches.
> I am guessing that :
> * 2.3 is experimental
> * 2.2 is stable
No, meanwhile they are both stable, and have both the same
bugs. I could switch to 2.3 every day.
I also back-ported all of Bob's changes for 2.3 into 2.2,
to keep the Stackless files idenical as far as possible.
The reason is that Giovanny asked for some time for the
> and that bug fixes going into 2.3 *are* being progated back to 2.2
> So if I am going to play around with autoscheduling which one do I play
Since auto-scheduling is a new feature, I'd use 2.3.
We might want to back-port, but this is less urgent
ciao - chris
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
More information about the Stackless