[Stackless] CVS 2.2 or 2.3

Christian Tismer tismer at stackless.com
Tue Feb 10 19:11:55 CET 2004


Richard Emslie wrote:

> Hi Chris, Hi stackless - eers!

Hi Rich!

> I am confused to the current state of the cvs branches.
> 
> I am guessing that :
> 
> * 2.3 is experimental
> * 2.2 is stable

No, meanwhile they are both stable, and have both the same
bugs. I could switch to 2.3 every day.
I also back-ported all of Bob's changes for 2.3 into 2.2,
to keep the Stackless files idenical as far as possible.
The reason is that Giovanny asked for some time for the
transition.

> and that bug fixes going into 2.3 *are* being progated back to 2.2
> 
> So if I am going to play around with autoscheduling which one do I play
> with?

Since auto-scheduling is a new feature, I'd use 2.3.
We might want to back-port, but this is less urgent
than bug-fixes.

ciao - chris
-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/



_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless



More information about the Stackless mailing list