[Stackless] Make the Stackless Scheduler Your Friend Re: Realistic ticking and acting

[Grant Olson]

Richard wrote:
> 
> On 7/14/06, stackless at kaishaku.org <stackless at kaishaku.org> wrote:
> > I think if channels returned controlled to the caller
> > when blocked I would have a much easier time with this.
> 
> You mean like the preference attribute allows you to do?
> 
>     preference:	    0    no preference, caller will continue
> 		    1    sender will be inserted after receiver and run
> 		    -1   receiver will be inserted after sender and run
> 
> Richard.
> 

I was just going to ask about implementing "send-and-pray" functionality.
Good to see it's already there. ;-)

-Grant


_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless