[Stackless] The case for Twisted
Edward Faulkner
ef at alum.mit.edu
Thu Aug 9 18:39:35 CEST 2007
I think much of the confusion around this topic is caused by
stacklesssocket, which contains its own rather-limited event loop.
It is a bad idea to build a real application on stacklesssocket.
Using twisted's reactor would be a much better choice. You could even
still do monkey-patching and give it the same public interface.
I already had my own event loop, as I've been doing unix asynchronous
IO for a long time, and already learned the hard way where all the
pitfalls are. I agree that it's hard to get right, and should not be
undertaken lightly, unless it's just for fun.
regards,
Ed
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
http://stackless.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stackless
More information about the Stackless
mailing list