[Stackless] why the TaskletExit?

[Andrew Dalke]

On Jan 25, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Richard Tew wrote:
> The wiki page is badly wrong.  The only argument schedule takes and
> its docstring names it as retval, is a value to return instead of the
> current tasklet when it has finished scheduling.

Why in the world is that useful?

> Admittedly I didn't run the code above, but I am confident it will
> illustrate how schedule does nothing related to turning runnables
> into tasklets :-)

I ran the code without the extra calls and it worked as you predicted.

					Andrew
					dalke at dalkescientific.com


_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless