[Stackless] A Solution Re: Advice on Writing a Stackless Reactorfor Twisted

[David Wyand]

Accidentally sent to only Andrew so forwarding to the list:

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Andrew Francis
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:33 PM
> Hello David and Colleagues:
>>I'm certainly new at this so any guidance is greatly
>>appreciated, although I  don't want to hijack
> Andrew's >original query.
>
> I posted a second time to the Twisted mailing list,
> describing my problem in more detail. Folks were
> helpful, but Phil Mayers really provided the
> information I was looking for. I am still testing but
> things are looking good. Once I am comfortable with
> the solution, I will post to the Wiki complete with
> examples.

Hi Andrew.

Thanks for continuing to look into this and working out a solution.  I
unfortunately had some other fires to put out and was not able to continue
with my own experimentation.

Originally I was trying to avoid OS threads because of the added complexity
and possibility of hard to track down errors they usually entail.  But it
sounds like this is the best solution to prevent any blocking with
Twisted -- something that I certainly want to avoid as well.

I'll see if I can put together my own solution based on your code to date
and will post it for others to look over.

Thanks again!

- Dave
http://www.gnometech.com


_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless