[Stackless] Stackless WSGI server

Seun Osewa seun.osewa at gmail.com
Fri Jul 13 12:12:54 CEST 2007

I really don't see what's so wonderful about WSGI.
The old CGI standard and its adaptations (FastCGI, SCGI) were pretty good.

Due to Python's dynamic nature, the CGI can be emulated without any
performance penalty, such that old Python CGI scripts will continue to work
within FastCGI and SCGI and similar environments.

Therefore i think the WSGI standard is unnecessary.  I resent having to
learn it at all.  It's not even particularly elegant compared to CGI - just
*different* - and that pisses me off!

On 7/13/07, Stephan Diehl <stephan.diehl at gmx.net> wrote:
> (just mailing the stackless list)
> Arnar Birgisson wrote:
> > On 7/12/07, Christian Tismer <tismer at stackless.com> wrote:
> >> I think we don't need to discuss what is possible.
> >> Everything is possible, in almost every language.
> >> It just does not happen without support.
> >
> > Absolutely, sorry for the noise.
> >
> > If you guys want to discuss how we would implement a Seaside-like
> > framework in Stackless, I'm in. Let me know if this is not the right
> > place for that.
> as long as nobody complains, this is the right place :-)
> I need to play around with your stuff before I could say anything usefull.
> [...]
> >
> > cheers,
> > Arnar
> >

Seun Osewa
http://www.nairaland.com [vast Nigerian forum]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/attachments/20070713/e189a138/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com

More information about the Stackless mailing list