[Stackless] Proposed modification WRT threading and scheduling
arnarbi at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 14:54:57 CET 2008
Richard, did you make this change already? Is it in the release
version of stackless (2.51)?
For some reason, my stackless wsgi server is not working as it should,
run() is exiting even though there is a tasklet waiting for the socket
On Jan 15, 2008 2:24 AM, Christian Tismer <tismer at stackless.com> wrote:
> Richard Tew wrote:
> > On Jan 10, 2008 11:57 AM, Arnar Birgisson <arnarbi at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 9, 2008 8:14 PM, Jeff Senn <senn at maya.com> wrote:
> >>> ALWAYS do that. And I do believe that returning is the "correct"
> >>> decision because it leaves
> >>> the higher-level scheduling up to the implementor. (You could, for
> >>> instance as Arnar implies,
> >>> wrap .run() in a loop with time.sleep())
> >> I agree, keep the behavior consistent and leave it up to the caller of
> >> run() to reinvoke if desired.
> > I am tempted to say it isn't worth breaking backwards compatibility
> > and no-one really noticed it anyway. But I had no clue why the
> > scheduler locked up and had to run Stackless under a debugger in order
> > to realise this was how it really worked.
> I was not quite sure how things should work when I implemented
> this. The idea was to extend the "is there anything that can run"
> concept across threads.
> But I agree. This complicates things more than it helps.
> > I would be for also changing this behaviour, but am reticent to do so
> > without Christian's go ahead. Any thoughts Christian?
> As far as I can think with my psyco-swamped brain, I'd say
> go for it!
> cheers - chris
> Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
> tismerysoft GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
> Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9A : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
> 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
> work +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 30 80 90 57 05
> PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
> whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Stackless