[Stackless] Exception passing patch
richard.m.tew at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 06:52:04 CET 2009
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Peter Ingebretson <pingebre at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Does this seem like a reasonable patch? Do you have any suggestions for how this should be done differently; for instance, should sending a exception type be deprecated now?
Thanks for the patch.
However, it goes against a previous change. Some time in the past
Christian removed sending of exception instances, and replaced it with
sending types and arguments. If the reasoning behind his change was
because of problems it caused, then that would of course rule out any
possibility of reversing it.
Out of curiosity, can you give some examples of where you find it
useful to do this?
More information about the Stackless