[Stackless] Fwd: stackless 2.6.2 on OS-X
senn at maya.com
Sat Jun 20 03:11:21 CEST 2009
There is an extra configure option (that is not default only for
historical reasons which
no one can seem to remember -- which is sad because I think I added
it :-) )
that you need on OS-X
BUT: if you want to build a complete OS-X framework compatible version
all the bells and whistles, the best thing to do is to:
You will need a net connection, because that will download and build a
extra packages, but you will wind up with a much more "Mac compatible"
dist when you are done.
On Jun 19, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Kevin Kelley wrote:
> Hmm... I couldn't even get Stackless 2.6.2 to build on OS X. Latest
> system software version, latest XCode version.
> When I download the source tarball from stackless.com and run ./
> configure && make, I get the following errors:
> ./Stackless/core/slp_transfer.c: In function 'slp_transfer':
> ./Stackless/core/slp_transfer.c:143: warning: control may reach end
> of non-void function 'slp_switch' being inlined
> ./Stackless/platf/switch_x86_unix.h:37: error: PIC register 'ebx'
> clobbered in 'asm'
> (Retyped, so please excuse any mistakes.) This is on one of the new
> unibody Macbooks. Am I doing something silly?
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Jeff Senn <senn at maya.com> wrote:
> I didn't check uber-carefully, but it seemed like the former -
> otherwise I would have suggested patching it. :-)
> IIRC it had to do with making the cute little folder icon resource
> that makes the disk image folder look nice -- and I don't see
> how it could be stackless related (However, I did not go to the
> trouble of building the stock version in exactly the same way
> to make sure...)
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Richard Tew wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Jeff Senn<senn at maya.com> wrote:
> Ah! I did need to fix one bug in Mac/BuildScript/build-installer.py,
> due to some odd path problems. And then run the installer script by
> Is this a general Python OS X build problem? Or is it caused by
> something to do with Stackless?
> If it is the former, I cannot include this patch in the SLP
> repository. But if it is the latter, I can.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Stackless