[Stackless] Fwd: Stackless Python 2.6.3 for OSX (dmg)
richard.m.tew at gmail.com
Tue Oct 6 05:27:27 CEST 2009
MacOS users. What's up with the MacOS version on these installers?
Does it matter? Can I just provide one of them for all versions of
MacOS, are separate versions needed? Can't you all just move to
Windows? (I kid on that last one)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Aleksandar Radulovic <alex at a13x.net>
Date: Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: Stackless Python 2.6.3 for OSX (dmg)
To: Richard Tew <richard.m.tew at gmail.com>
I build 2.6.3 for 10.3, 10.4 and 10.5 - even with default settings
(10.3) it still adds the target
to the name, so it's just a matter of renaming the installer, I guess.
I've put all three on the same location, they only differ in the target name:
Would be best to check with others on the mailing list to see which
target is the
most used one..
I'll build the 3.1.1 tomorrow, I had some problems with it earlier today..
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Aleksandar Radulovic <alex at a13x.net> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> I've managed to compile and build the installer using 10.5 as deployment target,
> that's probably where the name comes from..
> Question is, considering that Snow Leopard came out (10.6) and 10.5 seems to be
> on majority of systems, should we support 10.4?
> Anyways, I can rebuild the DMG for 10.4, that shouldn't be a problem..
> Will let you know..
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Richard Tew <richard.m.tew at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Aleksandar Radulovic <alex at a13x.net> wrote:
>>> Hi, Richard..
>>> I've finished with the build of Stackless for OS X, you can fetch it from here:
>>> I'll let you knwo when I build the 3.1.1..
>> Hi Alex,
>> Thanks for this. I see this is named with the MacOS version 10.5, is
>> that important? The others are versionless with regard to MacOS in
>> the file name, and if there is no difference with regard to this, I'd
>> prefer to have the filenames consistent.
> a lex 13 x
a lex 13 x
More information about the Stackless