[Stackless] Fwd: Stackless Python 2.6.3 for OSX (dmg)
alex at a13x.info
Tue Oct 6 13:52:04 CEST 2009
I am running 10.6 and 10.5 versions of OS X, so I've installed 10.5
build of Stackless.
Question is, should we support 10.3 and 10.4 versions of OSX with binary builds
or just leave them with option of building it themselves?
I personally think it's ok to provide only the 10.5 binary installer.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Richard Tew <richard.m.tew at gmail.com> wrote:
> MacOS users. What's up with the MacOS version on these installers?
> Does it matter? Can I just provide one of them for all versions of
> MacOS, are separate versions needed? Can't you all just move to
> Windows? (I kid on that last one)
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Aleksandar Radulovic <alex at a13x.net>
> Date: Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Stackless Python 2.6.3 for OSX (dmg)
> To: Richard Tew <richard.m.tew at gmail.com>
> Hi Richard,
> I build 2.6.3 for 10.3, 10.4 and 10.5 - even with default settings
> (10.3) it still adds the target
> to the name, so it's just a matter of renaming the installer, I guess.
> I've put all three on the same location, they only differ in the target name:
> Would be best to check with others on the mailing list to see which
> target is the
> most used one..
> I'll build the 3.1.1 tomorrow, I had some problems with it earlier today..
> Best regards,
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Aleksandar Radulovic <alex at a13x.net> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>> I've managed to compile and build the installer using 10.5 as deployment target,
>> that's probably where the name comes from..
>> Question is, considering that Snow Leopard came out (10.6) and 10.5 seems to be
>> on majority of systems, should we support 10.4?
>> Anyways, I can rebuild the DMG for 10.4, that shouldn't be a problem..
>> Will let you know..
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Richard Tew <richard.m.tew at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Aleksandar Radulovic <alex at a13x.net> wrote:
>>>> Hi, Richard..
>>>> I've finished with the build of Stackless for OS X, you can fetch it from here:
>>>> I'll let you knwo when I build the 3.1.1..
>>> Hi Alex,
>>> Thanks for this. I see this is named with the MacOS version 10.5, is
>>> that important? The others are versionless with regard to MacOS in
>>> the file name, and if there is no difference with regard to this, I'd
>>> prefer to have the filenames consistent.
>> a lex 13 x
> a lex 13 x
> Stackless mailing list
> Stackless at stackless.com
a lex 13 x
More information about the Stackless