[Stackless] (no subject)

Andrew Francis andrewfr_ice at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 10 22:34:17 CEST 2009


--- On Fri, 10/9/09, Richard Tew <richard.m.tew at gmail.com> wrote:

> What you have to understand Andrew, is that anyone who
> answered this question would more than likely have to read the source
> code to make sure themselves before they answered.

Again I don't want to get into an protracted argument but I disagree. I do not believe it is unreasonable for a bigger software company to have that sort of fundamental information in a formal specification for easy reference.  



More information about the Stackless mailing list