[Stackless] Stackless downloads page

Ferdinando Milella f.milella at simx.co.uk
Tue Oct 27 09:58:05 CET 2009


Hi Richard,
 
I agree with Kevin. Grouping old versions under a common link "obsolete
versions" but somehow being able to access them I think it's a good idea,
since there are also third-party applications out there still using API
based on very old versions of stackless Python like 2.2.
 
Cheers
 
Nando
 
 
From: stackless-bounces at stackless.com
[mailto:stackless-bounces at stackless.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Kelley
Sent: 26 October 2009 19:44
To: Richard Tew
Cc: stackless at stackless.com
Subject: Re: [Stackless] Stackless downloads page
 
Richard,

When I'm trying to support multiple platforms it's often more convenient to
fix the version of each of the several libraries that I use.  There's
certainly nothing wrong with collecting those links under an "obsolete
versions" header or on another page, but not being able to get the
particular version that I want has caused headaches in the past when
minor-yet-significant changes occur.

Best,

Kevin
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Richard Tew <richard.m.tew at gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,

The stackless downloads page..

http://www.stackless.com/download/

.. features every release of Stackless made.  I am considering paring
it down to latest releases for each version.

e.g. 2.5.2, 2.6.3, 3.0.1, 3.1.1  etc

Anyone think there is a need to keep the links to the obseleted
versions available?

Cheers,
Richard.

_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.32/2460 - Release Date: 10/26/09
08:10:00
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/attachments/20091027/25ca4fda/attachment.htm>


More information about the Stackless mailing list