[Stackless] Building on Ubuntu

Darren Govoni darren at ontrenet.com
Mon Nov 21 13:39:57 CET 2011


Hi Richard,
   Thanks for the tips. I will try to run the unit tests, but the build 
process failed so I suspect its incomplete install.

Is there a general "unsupported" process for mapping or combining 
existing working python libs to the stackless install?

thanks,
Darren

On 11/20/2011 11:04 PM, Richard Tew wrote:
>
> On Sunday, November 20, 2011, Darren Govoni <darren at ontrenet.com 
> <mailto:darren at ontrenet.com>> wrote:
> >  I am trying to build a compatible stackless python using stackless 
> 2.6.5.
> > I have python 2.6.6 updated on my system with many packages.
> >
> > I can build a stackless executable but it doesn't pick up many packages,
> > like multiprocessing, etc.
>
> Not sure I understand what packages you mean and how it is not picking 
> em up.
>
> > Also, I get this error in the build:
> >
> > Compiling /usr/local/lib/python2.6/xml/sax/saxutils.py ...
> > Compiling /usr/local/lib/python2.6/xml/sax/xmlreader.py ...
> > Compiling /usr/local/lib/python2.6/xmllib.py ...
> > Compiling /usr/local/lib/python2.6/xmlrpclib.py ...
> > Compiling /usr/local/lib/python2.6/zipfile.py ...
> > make: *** [libinstall] Error 1
>
> Do the Stackless unit tests pass for you?  What about the Python 
> regression tests?  If these both pass, then I cannot tell you why this 
> generic python build step fails.  I expect it to be something related 
> to your local system.  If you can debug it and do some verbose output 
> to see why it fails, feel free to post that to the list.
>
> > I am running ubuntu 10.04 64bit. I want stackless to work with all my
> > existing packages. Is it possible?
>
> Whether it is, is beyond the scope of Stackless.  This is a general 
> Python problem, how to install two versions of the same interpreter 
> and have them share the same lib directories.  Yes, it is possible. 
>  No, unfortunately I do not know how offhand.  But keep in mind that 
> Stackless has modified and extra lib files.  You would have to deal 
> with that, all in all, unsupported..
>
> Cheers,
> Richard.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stackless mailing list
> Stackless at stackless.com
> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/attachments/20111121/f98a1aa3/attachment.html>


More information about the Stackless mailing list