[Stackless] pypi stackless, how's it going?
a.kruis at science-computing.de
Mon Sep 17 11:34:19 CEST 2012
it's time to announce a little progress. After the EuroPython2012
conference is was very busy and I was on holiday.
Last week I was finally able to continue the stackless installer. I just
released a new version to PyPi, that add Linux AMD64 support.
This release completes my effort to provide a proof of concept package.
So if you have python on linux 64bit or windows 32bit, please try
$ pip install stackless-python
You should get the commands slpython.exe or slpythonw.exe on Windows or
slpython2.7 on Linux. I'm confident, that the Linux binaries work well
on most distributions, but I can't test them all.
As already discussed, we definitively need an umbrella project, that
selects the "right" installer. The main reason is, that the current
"single package" installer does not scale. We simply can't include
binaries for every platform and pip is not smart enough to select among
I propose the rename the current PyPi package "stackless-python" and to
reuse the name "stackless-python" for the umbrella project.
The umbrella project would be an ordinary python package, installable
with pip or easy_install. During its installation, the umbrella package
would use pip to install the right stackless-python installer package.
Is there anybody willing to write the umbrella installer? Of course, I
can do it, but it might take some time.
Am 21.08.2012 14:03, schrieb Christian Tismer:
> Hi Richard,
> On 7/26/12 11:14 PM, Richard Tew wrote:
>> Hi Anselm / Christian,
>> I was wondering how this was going? Is it generally usable? What
>> needs to be done before we can document it on the Stackless site? If
>> it is ready, how do we relate it to the existing mechanisms? When it
>> is ready, maybe we can script it's generation, installation, testing,
>> upload to pypi as part of a release.
>> Also Christian, you had some other ideas related to Stackless. Are
>> you planning to take them forward or still considering them?
> Anselm was very busy with a project, and I was/am very busy with my
> back pain, and before I can manage that, my activities are very limited.
> But the pip installer will definately be finalized.
> Actually, I prefer it very much over the current installation
> process. At EuroPython, I wanted to try something quickly with
> Stackless, had no time to build it, so I tried a stackless .dmg on
> OS X, but that screwed my system python, mercurial stopped working
> etc. etc.
> For sure it could have been fixed, but on a congress in a hurry, that
> exactly made the big difference.
> This was a quite ironic experience: After my talk, where I emphasized
> the benefits of the new installation approach, I was hit and distracted
> by the existing one. Things should just work without thinking.
> So I'm really convinced:
> Stackless should no longer replace any python installation at all.
> Instead, it should use the installed version and collaborate nicely
> with that, instead of possibly fighting it and breaking something.
> Concerning other stackless related ideas I had: Can you give me a hint?
> Right now I have no access to my memory ;-)
> cheers - Chris
Dipl. Phys. Anselm Kruis science + computing ag
Senior Solution Architect Ingolstädter Str. 22
email A.Kruis at science-computing.de 80807 München, Germany
phone +49 89 356386 874 fax 737 www.science-computing.de
Vorstandsvorsitzender/Chairman of the board of management:
Vorstand/Board of Management:
Dr. Bernd Finkbeiner, Michael Heinrichs,
Dr. Arno Steitz, Dr. Ingrid Zech
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/
Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
Sitz/Registered Office: Tuebingen
Registergericht/Registration Court: Stuttgart
Registernummer/Commercial Register No.: HRB 382196
More information about the Stackless