[Stackless] python 2.8

Kristján Valur Jónsson kristjan at ccpgames.com
Tue Dec 31 11:05:56 CET 2013


What I don't understand is why cpython hasn't been forked long ago. Does it have some legal status preventing it from that? And whats with the mandatory contributors agreement? That sounds really odd in the day and age of freely forkable open source projects.


Sent from the æther.


-------- Original message --------
From: Richard Tew <richard.m.tew at gmail.com>
Date:
To: The Stackless Python Mailing List <stackless at stackless.com>
Subject: Re: [Stackless] python 2.8


Maybe there's a lesson to be learned that you just can't make
divergent jumps like this, and expect the community to follow.  But
then again, the community will have no choice but to eventually follow
given 2.x is closed.

Personally, I'm over it.  It's all in the doing now, we release
Stackless 2.8 because that's what we're interested in.

Cheers,
Richard.

On 12/31/13, Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan at ccpgames.com> wrote:
> Alex Gaynor just blogged about the failed state of 3.x and the need to give
> in and produce a better 2.x
>
>
>
> http://alexgaynor.net/2013/dec/30/about-python-3/
>

_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless at stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/attachments/20131231/37eb5a47/attachment.html>


More information about the Stackless mailing list