[Stackless] Stackless 2.8 layout (or stackless python 404)
richard.m.tew at gmail.com
Thu Nov 28 07:45:05 CET 2013
pydica seems to be a documentation system.
I was wondering if there was some consensus on the earlier question, I
think you asked, about whether we should use the current trac-based
issue system on stackless.com - or switch over to having the issues on
I'm happy to set up the issues on bitbucket, and do whatever work is required.
Is there anyone who feels strongly that we should keep using the
trac-based issue system on stackless.com?
What were you thinking I should do with pydica, Christian?
On 11/28/13, Christian Tismer <tismer at stackless.com> wrote:
> On 27/11/13 06:02, Richard Tew wrote:
>> Are we not doing issues on bitbucket.org?
> I have not yet set it up.
> I'm working with Pydica since a long time but never used that.
> You are now an admin of stackless-dev/stackless if you like to try it.
> cheers - chris
> Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
> Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
> Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
> 14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
> phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
> PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
> whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
> Stackless mailing list
> Stackless at stackless.com
More information about the Stackless