[Stackless] Fwd: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives

Kristján Valur Jónsson kristjan at ccpgames.com
Fri Nov 29 10:00:28 CET 2013

> -----Original Message-----
> From: stackless-bounces at stackless.com [mailto:stackless-
> bounces at stackless.com] On Behalf Of Christian Tismer
> Sent: 28. nóvember 2013 22:27
> To: stackless at stackless.com
> Subject: [Stackless] Fwd: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill
> fated initiatives
> Hi friends,
> I almost fell in the trap to react to this by saying """hey, I could have reacted
> exactly as anatoly did""".
> Guido's explainment is the first thing that was understandable to me.
> The whole rest, hard to follow links to long chains of other links to related
> documents, the unfriendly, burocratic treatment in the issue-tracker, the
> closing of issue as a slap in the face - this made me feel like it was myself:
> It appears as he wanted to improve the PEP process and submit a patch to
> the peps by a pull request that was not the way peps work.
> My goodness, he was asked to discuss this first on python-ideas!
> I think I know why I never submit peps.
> I would like to know your opinion befor I start another fight for nothing.
> I have the impression that people no longer realize how boring and
> distracting it is to even read all the stuff.
> And I think the intent to avoid a discussion in the large on Python-dev was a
> good thing that should be honored.

Perhaps next PyCon is a good place to discuss these things.  Maybe we should get
in tough with someone who is likely to sympathise with these views and set up
some sort of a forum, a BOF or whatever they are called, to bring these
concerns that many of us are surely having.

Who's going to PyCon this year?


More information about the Stackless mailing list