a.kruis at science-computing.de
Thu Sep 5 12:15:52 CEST 2013
Am 05.09.2013 08:27, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
> In short: Architectural niceness, and hopefully simpler platform support since platform support is part of the separate, smaller, and easily testable, tealet module.
Well that is a good reason to change 3.x, but is it a valid reason to
change 2.7? Only if we plan to add new architectures or if the change
greatly reduces the maintenance effort.
> In addition, hopefully faster switching with less memory use.
> For the latter case, I really should gather some metrics, of course :)
Increased performance justifies the case, especially if you have a large
Kristján, how risky is the change? Currently 2.7-slp is a very reliable
piece of software used on many production sites. Every new bug is really
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stackless-bounces at stackless.com [mailto:stackless-bounces at stackless.com] On Behalf Of Anselm Kruis
> Sent: 4. september 2013 14:39
> To: stackless at stackless.com
> Subject: Re: [Stackless] stackless-tealet
> What are the key benefits we get from tealet? I wonder, if there is any compelling reason to change the 2.7 implementation.
Dipl. Phys. Anselm Kruis science + computing ag
Senior Solution Architect Ingolstädter Str. 22
email A.Kruis at science-computing.de 80807 München, Germany
phone +49 89 356386 874 fax 737 www.science-computing.de
Vorstandsvorsitzender/Chairman of the board of management:
Vorstand/Board of Management:
Dr. Bernd Finkbeiner, Michael Heinrichs,
Dr. Arno Steitz, Dr. Ingrid Zech
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/
Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
Sitz/Registered Office: Tuebingen
Registergericht/Registration Court: Stuttgart
Registernummer/Commercial Register No.: HRB 382196
More information about the Stackless