[Stackless] MacOS stackless installers needed

[Hervé Coatanhay]

@Werner I created a Tap for stackless formula
https://github.com/Alzakath/homebrew-stackless .

You just have to do `brew tap alzakath/stackless` then it should be
possible to do `brew install stackless`.

Cheers
Hervé

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Hervé Coatanhay
<herve.coatanhay at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am having trouble building an installer on Mac OS X 10.9, (I had to
> change build-installer.py to change LDFLAGS).
>
> @Robert Did you build the last installer on Mavericks with XCode 5.1?
> Did you do anything special ? My command line is:
>
> ./build-installer.py
> --sdk-path=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk/
>  --dep-target=10.8  --universal-archs=intel
>
> And I had to remove this from LDFLAGS:
> -syslibroot,/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk
>
> I grabbed the source from
> https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless and trie to build from
> 2.7-slp branch.
>
> I'm thinking it is too much changes already just to build an
> installer, I must do something wrong.
>
> Cheers
> Hervé
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Filip M. Nowak <stackless at oneiroi.net> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On 03.04.2014 15:28, Hervé Coatanhay wrote:
>>> Hi FIlip,
>>> Both MacOS installer and homebrew use the framework-approach. This
>>> left prefix-approach for people that feels like hacking around IMHO.
>>
>> "hackishness" of prefix-approach is a matter of open discussion I would
>> say. I must admit that I used to prefix-based way (and it is extensively
>> used in many POSIX OSes packaging systems) but I agree that for Mac OS X
>> framework thingy is more proper.
>>
>>> For Homebrew, it might be as simple as creating a "keg only" Stackless
>>> Formula provided by a "Tap"  on github.
>>>
>>> Concerning MacOS Installer, as I understand it, we're facing the
>>> following choice:
>>>
>>>     - provide a Stackless installer which override official CPython
>>> installer (the choice made so far)
>>>     - change build-script.py to change the "framework name"
>>
>> I would go for the second option (with installer) - but again, it's just
>> me. This would be less confusing, easier and probably safer for packager
>> himself :) . At the end what's the goal? Basically - to provide usable
>> and nice enough instance of Stackless for Mac OS x? If so this would do.
>>
>>> Does it sum it up well ?
>>
>> Absolutely.
>>
>>> Hervé
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Filip M. Nowak <stackless at oneiroi.net> wrote:
>>>> (...)
>>
>>         All the best,
>>         Filip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stackless mailing list
>> Stackless at stackless.com
>> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless