[Stackless] MacOS stackless installers needed
herve.coatanhay at gmail.com
Tue Apr 8 15:54:26 CEST 2014
I tried to build the installer from 2.7 branch and it is failing on
sqlite compilation whereas 3.4 it is on xz compilation. The error is
about -syslibroot option which is not supported anymore by clang.
It comes from clang changes in XCode 5.1,
and choice made in sqlite configure script: concatenate CFLAGS and
LDFLAGS and pass them as parameters to compiler.
I added -Wno-error=unused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future
option for SQLite and SleepyCat DB and it builds OK on 2.7 branch.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson
<kristjan at ccpgames.com> wrote:
> Have you tried regular CPython 2.7? It is possible that 2.7 doesn't support that platform yet.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: stackless-bounces at stackless.com [mailto:stackless-
>> bounces at stackless.com] On Behalf Of Hervé Coatanhay
>> Sent: 4. apríl 2014 12:46
>> To: The Stackless Python Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [Stackless] MacOS stackless installers needed
>> I am having trouble building an installer on Mac OS X 10.9, (I had to change
>> build-installer.py to change LDFLAGS).
>> @Robert Did you build the last installer on Mavericks with XCode 5.1?
>> Did you do anything special ? My command line is:
>> --dep-target=10.8 --universal-archs=intel
>> And I had to remove this from LDFLAGS:
>> I grabbed the source from
>> https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless and trie to build from 2.7-slp
>> I'm thinking it is too much changes already just to build an installer, I must do
>> something wrong.
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Filip M. Nowak <stackless at oneiroi.net>
>> > Hi there,
>> > On 03.04.2014 15:28, Hervé Coatanhay wrote:
>> >> Hi FIlip,
>> >> Both MacOS installer and homebrew use the framework-approach. This
>> >> left prefix-approach for people that feels like hacking around IMHO.
>> > "hackishness" of prefix-approach is a matter of open discussion I
>> > would say. I must admit that I used to prefix-based way (and it is
>> > extensively used in many POSIX OSes packaging systems) but I agree
>> > that for Mac OS X framework thingy is more proper.
>> >> For Homebrew, it might be as simple as creating a "keg only"
>> >> Stackless Formula provided by a "Tap" on github.
>> >> Concerning MacOS Installer, as I understand it, we're facing the
>> >> following choice:
>> >> - provide a Stackless installer which override official CPython
>> >> installer (the choice made so far)
>> >> - change build-script.py to change the "framework name"
>> > I would go for the second option (with installer) - but again, it's
>> > just me. This would be less confusing, easier and probably safer for
>> > packager himself :) . At the end what's the goal? Basically - to
>> > provide usable and nice enough instance of Stackless for Mac OS x? If so
>> this would do.
>> >> Does it sum it up well ?
>> > Absolutely.
>> >> Hervé
>> >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Filip M. Nowak <stackless at oneiroi.net>
>> >>> (...)
>> > All the best,
>> > Filip
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Stackless mailing list
>> > Stackless at stackless.com
>> > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
>> Stackless mailing list
>> Stackless at stackless.com
> Stackless mailing list
> Stackless at stackless.com
More information about the Stackless