Kristján Valur Jónsson
kristjan at ccpgames.com
Tue Mar 4 14:11:40 CET 2014
why not just go with 3.2? Does anyone use this number at all anyway?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stackless-bounces at stackless.com [mailto:stackless-
> bounces at stackless.com] On Behalf Of Richard Tew
> Sent: 3. mars 2014 02:20
> To: stackless at stackless.com
> Subject: [Stackless] stackless_version.h
> 3.1b3 060516 is kind of a magic number, maybe we could do away with it? I
> was going to bump it to 3.2, but decided it would be a little confusing.
> Python 2.7.6r2 Stackless 3.1b3 060516 (default, Mar 3 2014, 15:11:44) [MSC
> v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license"
> for more information.
> Stackless mailing list
> Stackless at stackless.com
More information about the Stackless