[Stackless] stackless_version.h

[Richard Tew]

You mean like:

Python 3.2.5 Stackless 3.2.

It looks confusing.  Better just to ditch the number I think.

On 3/5/14, Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan at ccpgames.com> wrote:
> why not just go with 3.2?  Does anyone use this number at all anyway?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: stackless-bounces at stackless.com [mailto:stackless-
>> bounces at stackless.com] On Behalf Of Richard Tew
>> Sent: 3. mars 2014 02:20
>> To: stackless at stackless.com
>> Subject: [Stackless] stackless_version.h
>>
>> 3.1b3 060516 is kind of a magic number, maybe we could do away with it?
>> I
>> was going to bump it to 3.2, but decided it would be a little confusing.
>>
>> Objections?
>>
>> Python 2.7.6r2 Stackless 3.1b3 060516 (default, Mar  3 2014, 15:11:44)
>> [MSC
>> v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or
>> "license"
>> for more information.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Richard.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stackless mailing list
>> Stackless at stackless.com
>> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stackless mailing list
> Stackless at stackless.com
> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
>