Thanks for the information, I'll stick to the zip.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Richard Tew <<a href="mailto:richard.m.tew@gmail.com">richard.m.tew@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Richard Tew <<a href="mailto:richard.m.tew@gmail.com">richard.m.tew@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Thanks for letting me know :-)<br>
<br>
</div>I've recompiled Stackless using the free toolkit, rebuilt and uploaded<br>
the installer. It installs fine now. However, you're better off<br>
using the zip package unarchived over a standard Python 2.5.2 install.<br>
The free toolkit includes, as I understand it, a non-optimising<br>
compiler. The zip archive still contains the binaries I compiled<br>
using the full Visual Studio .NET 2003.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<font color="#888888">Richard.<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>