<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Kristjan and 2.8 heroes,<br>
<br>
On 13/11/13 15:04, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:EFE3877620384242A686D52278B7CCD38138C2C4@RKV-IT-EXCH104.ccp.ad.local"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="IS">Python 2.7.6 is upon us.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="IS">I‘ll merge it in presently.
<br>
</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
that raises a question concerning python 2.8.<br>
<br>
What would you say: Is 2.8 starting like any new python version,<br>
first version 2.8.0b1 and whatnot?<br>
<br>
Or: Does stackless 2.8 simply mirror the 2.7 numbering scheme,<br>
because 2.8 is just a clone of the respective 2.7 versions, with
some<br>
back-ported features from 3.X?<br>
<br>
IOW. would I try to produce a 2.8.5 final right now? And a 2.8.6
later because<br>
the version is still bloody, stackless-wise?<br>
<br>
And how about micro-numbers, are they sufficient to maintain the<br>
version of the added functionality? Or do we still need an extra
version<br>
for stackless appended?<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Christian Tismer :^) <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tismer@stackless.com"><mailto:tismer@stackless.com></a>
Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://starship.python.net/">http://starship.python.net/</a>
14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://pgp.uni-mainz.de">http://pgp.uni-mainz.de</a>
phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.stackless.com/">http://www.stackless.com/</a></pre>
</body>
</html>