<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div>What I don't understand is why cpython hasn't been forked long ago. Does it have some legal status preventing it from that? And whats with the mandatory contributors agreement? That sounds really odd in the day and age of freely forkable open source projects.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
Sent from the ćther. <br>
<br>
<br>
-------- Original message --------<br>
From: Richard Tew <richard.m.tew@gmail.com> <br>
Date: <br>
To: The Stackless Python Mailing List <stackless@stackless.com> <br>
Subject: Re: [Stackless] python 2.8 <br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Maybe there's a lesson to be learned that you just can't make<br>
divergent jumps like this, and expect the community to follow. But<br>
then again, the community will have no choice but to eventually follow<br>
given 2.x is closed.<br>
<br>
Personally, I'm over it. It's all in the doing now, we release<br>
Stackless 2.8 because that's what we're interested in.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Richard.<br>
<br>
On 12/31/13, Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan@ccpgames.com> wrote:<br>
> Alex Gaynor just blogged about the failed state of 3.x and the need to give<br>
> in and produce a better 2.x<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://alexgaynor.net/2013/dec/30/about-python-3/">http://alexgaynor.net/2013/dec/30/about-python-3/</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Stackless mailing list<br>
Stackless@stackless.com<br>
<a href="http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless">http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>